Saturday, July 4, 2015

Picture-Based Malware Attacks are New Trend

Making a resurgence among malware writers is steganography, which means to hide in plain sight, according to Dell Security’s Cyber Threats Unit.
The Stegoloader malware family, also known as Win32/Gatak.DR (Microsoft) and TSPY_GATAK.GTK (Trend Micro), appears to target healthcare, education, and manufacturing, and it does so with a seemingly innocent Portable Network Graphics (PNG) picture of the Earth in space.
Steganography, which combines the Greek words for “covered, concealed, or protected” with “writing,” was first coined around 1499 in a book, Steganographia, by Johannes Trithemius.
While the book was supposed be on magic it was actually about cryptography and steganography. Other examples include using the first letter of each printed line to spell out an alternative message.
For digital steganography, the secret message is embedded within the code of a document or image. In some cases the addition of a message will bloat the file so that it stands out as being changed or different.
However, newer techniques appear to address that concern.
For example, a malware creator might take a cute picture of a kitten and alter the color code of every 50th pixel to produce a desired alphanumeric, or alter the least significant byte to correspond to an alphanumeric.
The result would have a nominal increase in file side and be so subtle that analysis would be needed to identify the exact alterations.
Stegnoloader hides its main module’s code inside a PNG image. This is not exactly new. A variant of the Zeus banking Trojan used sunset pictures.
Another malware family hid malicious content inside an Android icon image, dnd the terrorist group Al Qaeda is known to have a used steganography in videos to communicate with its followers.
One advantage to using steganography is that most antivirus products do not actively scan image files for malware. According to Dell, another way Stegoloader attempts to avoid detection is the strings found in the binary are constructed in the program stack before being used.
However, Stegoloader will not execute if it finds there is active analysis or security tools installed on the infected system.
After downloading a PNG image from a URL hardcoded into the file, Stegoloader decompresses the image, accesses each pixel, and extracts the least significant bit from each color of each pixel.
Neither the PNG image nor the decoded messages are stored on the infected system’s hard drive in an attempt to be evasive.
The Stegoloader family is known to be distributed through a software piracy site. The malicious code includes modules that gather geographic location data, victims’ browsing history, passwords, and lists of recently opened documents.
At the moment Stegoloader appears to be only gathering intelligence.
Steganography has been used in operating botnets in recent years. The TDSS botnet used JPG images hosted on popular blogging sites for its Command & Control (C&C) communication, and ShadyRAT was also able to decrypt and decode C&C commands hidden within JPG files.
“It is my intuition that they might be selling compromised hosts to others,” Pierre-Marc Bureau, CTU senior security researcher, told SCMagazine.
“But they do not appear to be trying to build a big botnet. They are not trying to accumulate thousands upon thousands of infected hosts. I really think they are trying to find interesting networks [or] hosts.”
It should be noted that steganography does not always use pictures. The Morto Trojan, for example, actually hides its C&C traffic within simple DNS requests. Morto requests a non-existent domain from a hard-coded DNS server which is the actual C&C server.
The commands are embedded and obfuscated by a simple Base64 encoding within the DNS response. However, the DNS response is much larger than it needs to be and would therefore be suspicious on its own.

Thursday, May 14, 2015

How Chinese hackers snooped on Indian defence agencies for over 10 years

A Singapore based firm has uncovered a large scale cyber espionage network that is says is linked to the Chinese government. The network has been active for 10 years in the region and targets India in particular by infecting computer systems of key, selected individuals and organisations. Terming it the APT30, Singapore firm FireEye says that the infection is specially targeted at Indian military, aerospace and maritime sector.
What is interesting is that Singapore researches have uncovered the modus operandi of the spying network that uses decoy documents that users would download or read in their emails or online. The decoy documents contain a bug that can transmit data and information from the infection computer system back to servers in China. The bug can even hide in documents and infect secure computers not connected to a network.
The Decoy documents are specially tailored to meet the interests of individuals or organisations to be targeted - these include government agencies, private industry and media groups. Chinese hackers used decoy documents on Indian military movements in the South China sea, papers on the indigenous aircraft carrier under construction in Kochi, incidents on the China border and relations with Nepal to infect key
A sample of the phising documents includes :
A document titled - "India deploys world's largest military transport plane.doc"
Decoy documents on China's relationship with India, specially on military matters.
Documents related to Indian military projects, like the aircraft carrier being built at Kochi
Documents on Indian military activity in the South China Sea
FireEye says Indian firms infected include an aerospace and defense company and a telecommunications firm
Documents also relate to foreign relations in the region, including Bhutan and Nepal.






Read more at:
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-05-07/news/61902630_1_aircraft-carrier-chinese-hackers-decoy

Wednesday, May 6, 2015

How to hack a military DRONE!

The research paper turned how-to hacking guide

Esti Peshin, director of cyber programs for Israel Aerospace industries noted that the hacking and downing of a CIA stealth drone by Iranians occurred a month after one such paper was published. In December 2011, a report in the Christian Science Monitor highlighted that Iran navigated an unmanned CIA aerial vehicle safely to the ground by manipulating the aircraft’s GPS coordinates.

The research study from 2011, co-authored by Nils Ole Tippenhauer of ETH Zurich and other ETH and University of California academics, was titled “The Requirements for Successful GPS Spoofing Attacks.” The academics detailed how to mimic GPS signals to fool the GPS receivers on-board the UAV (Unmanned Ariel Vehicle) that aid navigation.

“It’s a PDF file… essentially, a blueprint for hackers,” Peshin said.

Peshin stressed that she does not know whether the CIA drone was hijacked using GPS spoofing or even whether the hacker read the study. Equally, she highlighted just how easily available the publication is online.

“You can Google, just look up ’Tippenhauer’ — it’s the first result in Google. Look up ‘UAV cyberattacks’ — it’s the third one. ‘UAV GPS spoofing attacks’ — the first one,” Peshin said, speaking at the Defensive Cyberspace Operations and Intelligence conference, an Israeli-American summit held in Washington.

In the research study, the academics explained where an attacker must be optimally located to generate fake signals capable of fooling GPS receivers. They also described ways to replace legitimate signals with an attacker’s bogus signals, which renders the target “losing the ability to calculate its position.”

Their intention was not to aid and abet terrorists, but rather to highlight “effect receiver-based countermeasures, which are not implemented yet in current standard GPS receivers,” the researchers noted. Despite this, hackers could have quickly exploited their instructions before defense manufacturers had time to update and fortify satellite-guided vehicles, Peshin said.

“The fact is that we are slower than the bad guys and the bad guys could take this article and render it into a form of an attack,” she said. “One of the things that keeps me up at night is cybersecurity for operational networks, military systems, weapons systems.”

Peshin also pointed to a 2013 NATO risk assessment that set a few alarm bells ringing. “At the end of the article, as if this was not enough, they listed several UAVs and said these are riskier than others by the way,” Peshin said.

She declined to comment on changes (if any), made to drone security after the papers were released.
Impact of the research papers on manufacturers

Clearly, the research papers had the desired effect at the end. The Pentagon is taking measures to protect drones from outside interference. A hacker-proof Boeing Little Bird helicopter drone is scheduled to take flight toward the end of 2017.